The Weakening of Critical Thinking in University Students in Contexts of Information Overload and Generative AI Use
Keywords:
Critical Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Literacy, Higher Education, Cognitive OffloadingAbstract
This documentary research analyzes the relationship between the use of generative artificial intelligence and the development of critical thinking in higher education students, within a context characterized by information overload. A qualitative, documentary approach with a descriptive-interpretative scope and critical orientation was adopted, based on a systematic review of scientific literature published between 2018 and 2026 in indexed databases. The final corpus included 13 relevant studies, analyzed through thematic categorization focusing on critical thinking, digital literacy, artificial intelligence use, and cognitive offloading. Findings indicate that the relationship between artificial intelligence and critical thinking is neither linear nor deterministic, but rather mediated by variables such as digital literacy, academic self-efficacy, academic stress, and pedagogical practices. Evidence suggests that intensive and uncritical use of these technologies may promote technological dependence and cognitive offloading, reducing cognitive effort. It is concluded that the weakening of critical thinking is not solely attributable to artificial intelligence use, but to its integration within educational contexts that fail to promote reflective analysis. The study highlights the need to reconfigure pedagogical practices toward the development of higher-order cognitive skills.
References
Acosta-Enríquez, B. G., Ballesteros, M. A. A., Valle, M. D. L. A. G., Angaspilco, J. E. M., Lalupú, J. D. R. A., Jaico, J. L. B., Castillo, W. E. J. (2025). The mediating role of academic stress, critical thinking and performance expectations in the influence of academic self-efficacy on AI dependence: Case study in college students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100381.
Baek, C., Tate, T., & Warschauer, M. (2024). “ChatGPT seems too good to be true”: College students’ use and perceptions of generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100294
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. American Philosophical Association. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.10.001
Hazari, S. (2024). Justification and roadmap for artificial intelligence (AI) literacy courses in higher education. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 14(1), 106–118.
Kalniņa, D., Nīmante, D., & Baranova, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence for higher education: Benefits and challenges for pre-service teachers. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1501819. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1501819
Le, N.-T. (2019). How do technology-enhanced learning tools support critical thinking? Frontiers in Education, 4, 126. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00126
Ninghardjanti, P., Umam, M. C., Subarno, A., Winarno, W., Langgi, N. R., & Widodo, J. (2025). Evaluating the impact of AI on the critical thinking skills among higher education students by combining the TAM model and critical thinking theory. Frontiers in Education.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en
Pelaez-Sanchez, I. C., Glasserman-Morales, L. D., & Rocha-Feregrino, G. (2024). Exploring digital competencies in higher education: Design and validation of instruments for the era of Industry 5.0. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1415800. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1415800
Salinas Montemayor, A. D., Monar Verdezoto, M. A., Padilla Frausto, J. J., & Padilla Samaniego, O. A. (2026). Nivel de competencias digitales en docentes universitarios y su impacto en la innovación pedagógica. Imperium Académico Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.63969/vj0p6j10
Tian, J., & Zhang, R. (2025). Learners’ AI dependence and critical thinking: The psychological mechanism of fatigue and the social buffering role of AI literacy. Acta Psychologica, 260, 105725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105725
Wang, H., Dang, A., Wu, Z., & Mac, S. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: Seeing ChatGPT through universities’ policies, resources, and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100326
Wang, Y. (2026). The effect of generative artificial intelligence literacy on academic achievement: The mediating role of academic self-efficacy and the moderating role of critical thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1761562. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1761562
Yuan, X., & Rehman, S. (2024). Digital literacy as a catalyst for academic confidence: Exploring the interplay between academic self-efficacy and academic procrastination among medical students. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06329-7
Zakir, S., Hoque, M. E., Susanto, P., Nisaa, V., Alam, M. K., Khatimah, H., & Mulyani, E. (2025). Digital literacy and academic performance: The mediating roles of digital informal learning, self-efficacy, and students’ digital competence. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1590274
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Multidisciplinary & Health Education Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.