Smart Classrooms and Academic Performance in Medical Students at the Universidad Privada Abierta Latinoamericana in Cochabamba, Bolivia

Authors

  • Rommer Alex Ortega-Martínez Hospital Obrero N.º 2 de la Caja Nacional de Salud, Cochabamba,
  • María Elena López Aguayo Universidad Privada Abierta Latinoamericana, Cochabamba,
  • Juan Eduardo Hinojosa Orlandini Universidad Privada Abierta Latinoamericana, Cochabamba,
  • María Regina Duran Ramírez Universidad Privada Abierta Latinoamericana, Cochabamba,
  • Marcelo Gutiérrez Panozo Universidad Privada Abierta Latinoamericana, Cochabamba,

Keywords:

Academic Performance, Educational Technology, Education Medical, Medical Students, Perception

Abstract

Introduction: Smart classrooms represent an educational innovation strategy aimed at integrating technological resources, pedagogical interaction, and more dynamic learning environments. However, their perceived usefulness and relationship with academic performance require context-specific evidence in medical education. This study aimed to evaluate the perceived usefulness of smart classrooms and its association with academic performance among medical students at a private university in Cochabamba, Bolivia. Methods: An observational, analytical, comparative, cross-sectional study was conducted among 153 medical students, distributed between smart classrooms n = 77 and traditional classrooms n = 76. A structured questionnaire with Likert-type items was administered to assess technological use, motivation, participation, perceived learning, satisfaction/recommendation, teaching innovation, and global usefulness. Academic performance was measured using the authorized final grade. Between-group comparisons, effect sizes, adjusted linear models, and logistic regression for high perceived usefulness were performed. Results: Students in smart classrooms showed higher mean scores across all perceptual dimensions. The largest differences were observed in technological use d = 1.149 and global usefulness d = 0.887. The proportion of students reporting high perceived usefulness was greater in smart classrooms than in traditional classrooms 75.3% vs. 51.3%, and this association remained significant after adjustment for age and sex adjusted OR = 2.57; 95% CI: 1.24-5.30; p = 0.011. No robust association was observed between classroom type and final grade. Discussion: Smart classrooms were associated with a better perception of educational usefulness, although no consistent evidence of improvement in academic performance was found.

Author Biographies

Rommer Alex Ortega-Martínez, Hospital Obrero N.º 2 de la Caja Nacional de Salud, Cochabamba,

Vicerrector de investigación, innovación y desarrollo institucional; Hospital Obrero N.º 2 de la Caja

Nacional de Salud, Cochabamba, Bolivia.

María Elena López Aguayo, Universidad Privada Abierta Latinoamericana, Cochabamba,

Coordinadora de investigación Cochabamba. Universidad Privada Abierta Latinoamericana, Cochabamba, Bolivia.

Juan Eduardo Hinojosa Orlandini, Universidad Privada Abierta Latinoamericana, Cochabamba,

Coordinador de investigación Oruro, Universidad Privada Abierta Latinoamericana, Cochabamba, Bolivia.

María Regina Duran Ramírez, Universidad Privada Abierta Latinoamericana, Cochabamba,

Estudiante de Bioquimica y Farmacia, Universidad Privada Abierta Latinoamericana, Cochabamba, Bolivia.

Marcelo Gutiérrez Panozo, Universidad Privada Abierta Latinoamericana, Cochabamba,

Estudiante de Medicina, Universidad Privada Abierta Latinoamericana, Cochabamba,

Bolivia.

References

UNESCO. Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? Paris: UNESCO; 2023. Disponible en: https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/technology

Alfoudari AM, Durugbo CM, Aldhmour FM. Exploring quality attributes of smart classrooms from the perspectives of academics. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023 Mar 24:1-43. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11452-3.

García-Tudela PA, Prendes-Espinosa P, Solano-Fernández IM. The Spanish experience of future classrooms as a possibility of smart learning environments. Heliyon. 2023 Jul 22;9(8):e18577. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18577

Ma Y, Zuo M, Gao R, Yan Y, Luo H. Interrelationships among College Students' Perceptions of Smart Classroom Environments, Perceived Usefulness of Mobile Technology, Achievement Emotions, and Cognitive Engagement. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 4;14(7):565. doi: 10.3390/bs14070565.

Yang Y, Yan Z, Zhu J, Guo W, Wu J, Huang B. The development and validation of the Student Self-feedback Behavior Scale. Front Psychol. 2025 Jan 6; 15:1495684. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1495684.

Jin S, Peng L. Classroom perception in higher education: The impact of spatial factors on student satisfaction in lecture versus active learning classrooms. Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 27; 13:941285. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941285.

Delungahawatta T, Dunne SS, Hyde S, Halpenny L, McGrath D, O'Regan A, Dunne CP. Advances in e-learning in undergraduate clinical medicine: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2022 Oct 7;22(1):711. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03773-1.

Abdull Mutalib AA, Md Akim A, Jaafar MH. A systematic review of health sciences students' online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 3;22(1):524. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03579-1.

Tabatabaeichehr M, Babaei S, Dartomi M, Alesheikh P, Tabatabaee A, Mortazavi H, et al. Medical students’ satisfaction level with e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic and its related factors: a systematic review. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 2022; 19:37. doi:10.3352/jeehp.2022.19.37

Tudor Car L, Poon S, Kyaw BM, Cook DA, Ward V, Atun R, et al. Digital education for health professionals: an evidence map, conceptual framework, and research agenda. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2022;24(3):e31977. doi:10.2196/31977

Kim HY, Kim EY. Effects of medical education program using virtual reality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023;20(5):3895. doi:10.3390/ijerph20053895

Spaic D, Bukumiric Z, Rajovic N, Markovic K, Savic M, Milin-Lazovic J, et al. The flipped classroom in medical education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2025;27: e60757. doi:10.2196/60757

García-Martín J, García-Sánchez JN. The digital divide of know-how and use of digital technologies in higher education: The case of a college in Latin America in the COVID-19 era. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(6):3358. doi:10.3390/ijerph19063358

Ndibalema P. Constraints of transition to online distance learning in Higher Education Institutions during COVID-19 in developing countries: A systematic review. E-Learning and Digital Media. 2022 Jun 8;19(6):595–618. doi: 10.1177/20427530221107510.

Inter-American Development Bank. Higher Education Digital Transformation in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: IDB; 2024. Disponible en: https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Higher-Education-Digital-Transformation-in-Latin-America-and-the-Caribbean.pdf

Lu K, Shi Y, Li J, Yang HH, Xu M. An investigation of college students’ learning engagement and classroom preferences under the smart classroom environment. SN Comput Sci. 2022; 3:205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01093-1

Lu G, Xie K, Liu Q. What influences student situational engagement in smart classrooms: perception of the learning environment and students’ motivation. Br J Educ Technol. 2022;53(6):1665-1687. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13204

Hu Y, Huang J, Kong F. College students' learning perceptions and outcomes in different classroom environments: A community of inquiry perspective. Front Psychol. 2022 Dec 1; 13:1047027. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1047027. PMID: 36532972; PMCID: PMC9751398.

Mao Q, Fang X, Jiang L, Zhu L. Enhancement or impediment? How university teachers’ use of smart classrooms might impact interaction quality. Sustainability. 2023;15(22):15826. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su152215826

Dai Z, Wang L, Peng X, Zhao L, Xiong J. A model for assessing student satisfaction with smart classroom environment in higher education. J Comput Assist Learn. 2024;40(6):2901-2916. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13045

Wang Y, Liu S, Pu L, Mao X, Shen S. College students’ learning experience and engagement in the smart classroom: the mediating role of self-efficacy in the background of COVID-19. SAGE Open. 2024;14(4). doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241285082

Chen C, Xiao LG. Human–computer interaction in smart classrooms: enhancing educational outcomes in Chinese higher education. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2025;41(22):14379-14400. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2025.2483851

Romli MH, Cheema MS, Mehat MZ, Md Hashim NF, Abdul Hamid H. Exploring the effectiveness of technology-based learning on the educational outcomes of undergraduate healthcare students: an overview of systematic reviews protocol. BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 23;10(11):e041153. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041153.

Kim JW, Myung SJ, Yoon HB, Moon SH, Ryu H, Yim JJ. How medical education survives and evolves during COVID-19: Our experience and future direction. PLoS One. 2020 Dec 18;15(12): e0243958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243958.

Erfannia L, Sharifian R, Yazdani A, Sarsarshahi A, Rahati R, Jahangiri S. Students' Satisfaction and e-Learning Courses in Covid-19 Pandemic Era: A Case Study. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2022 Jan 14;289:180-183. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210889.

McGee RG, Wark S, Mwangi F, et al. Digital learning of clinical skills and its impact on medical students’ academic performance: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24:1477. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06471-2

Martinengo L, Ng MSP, Ng TDR, Ang YI, Jabir AI, Kyaw BM, et al. Spaced digital education for health professionals: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2024;26:e57760. doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/57760

Naing C, Whittaker MA, Aung HH, Chellappan DK, Riegelman A. The effects of flipped classrooms to improve learning outcomes in undergraduate health professional education: a systematic review. Campbell Syst Rev. 2023;19(3):e1339. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1339

Mitchell AA, Ivimey-Cook ER. Technology-enhanced simulation for healthcare professionals: a meta-analysis. Front Med. 2023; 10:1149048. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1149048

Pupic N, Ghaffari-zadeh A, Hu R, Singla R, Darras K, Karwowska A, et al. An evidence-based approach to artificial intelligence education for medical students: a systematic review. PLOS Digit Health. 2023;2(11):e0000255. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000255

Published

2026-07-06

How to Cite

Ortega-Martínez, R. A. ., López Aguayo, M. E. ., Hinojosa Orlandini, J. E. ., Duran Ramírez, M. R. ., & Gutiérrez Panozo, M. . (2026). Smart Classrooms and Academic Performance in Medical Students at the Universidad Privada Abierta Latinoamericana in Cochabamba, Bolivia. Multidisciplinary &Amp; Health Education Journal, 8(1), 8170–8181. Retrieved from http://journalmhe.org/ojs3/index.php/jmhe/article/view/213